xxii TABLE OF CASES CITED. [Ex. VOL. IV. PAGE Wilkinson v. Godefroy . . 9 A. & E. 536 . . 193, 201 v. Kirby . . . 15 C. B. 430 . . . 94 Williams v. Earle . . . Law Rep. 3 Q. B. 739 . . 22 v. Steelo . . . 4 Ir. Law Recorder, 1C 9 . 138 Wilruot v. Corjwation of Coventry . 1 Y. & C. 518 . . 164 Wilson v. Towneud . . .30 L. J. (Ch.) 25 . . 127 Wiltshire v. Willett . . . 31 L. J. (M.C.) 8 .337 Wing , Tottenham and Hampstead June- > u R g Ch A ?4Q 31Q tion Railway Company . . J Winter v. Winter . . .5 Hare, 306 . . . 29 Wittingham v. Hill . . . Cro. Jac. 494 . . . 34 Wood v. Hewett . 8 Q. B. 913 . . .329 j 2 B. & P. (N. R.) 247 162, 164, 166 . . ' 167, 168 v. Waud . . . . 3 Ex. 748 . .45 Wright v. Woodgate . . . 2 C. M. & R. 573 . . 234 Y. Yard v. Ford . . 2 Wm. Saund. 172 . 337, 343 Yates v. Jack .... Law Kep. 1 Ch. 295 . . 127 York, Newcastle, and Berwick Railway) 23 L j (c p } lg GQ 61 Company v. Crisp. . . . )